Blocklist-Update.sh is a script that I wrote to manage blocklists from bluetack etc to be used in conjunction with Transmission torrent downloader in Linux/MacOS. The script can be taylored to work with Qbittorrent as well, but the placement of the blocklists means you'd have to redirect the blocklist to go somewhere locally manageable as Transmission uses its own blocklist directory in .config. I believe there are about 10 lists there now. It works well for my needs. It can be ran weekly using crontab in standard user profile. To download: blocklist-update.sh To download the others: Github
Antergos, a Spanish produced, Arch-based, Unix-Like operating system,
is a modern marvel to say the least, when compared to Ubuntu, Debian,
Manjaro, etc. Antergos works similarly to a standard build of Arch in
that it doesn’t really offer many bells and whistles itself,
whereas Manjaro uses its own repos, and seems self aware of what it
is doing in the way it manages SSDs and partitioning schemes.
Antergos is a more bare-bones system, which is not to say it doesn’t
add something over vanilla Arch, but it does so in a way that doesn’t
get in the way of the user, doesn’t effect the user’s ability to
use the operating system in any way. As I previously mentioned,
partitioning is different between Antergos and other Arch-based
distros like Manjaro in that Antergos pays close attention to detail
whilst installing. It creates a separate root and boot partitioning
schema on the drive with swap taking the rest. It seems to use a more
logical and advanced method that I can only assume comes from a
different piece of software in the background(Manjaro seems to use
Fdisk?). When observing the finished product with Parted and other
tools, the difference is easy to see. With Antergos, there are fewer
chances of partitions being placed outside of boundaries or being
misaligned so there is thus, fewer writes for each cycle being used.
Antergos also has a modern look and feel when booted. Antergos in
general is much more bare in terms of installed applications,
however, it makes it easy to install others with the pamac package
manager. KDE itself has fewer widgets and less to customize, but both
run really well. KDE is a favorite of mine because it can be
customized within inches of look and feel of Windows 10. KDE has had
its own issues in the past, even past versions were riddled with
bugs, however, Plasma5 as a desktop is an improvement and it’s
kinda growing on me. Antergos KDE has a more purist KDE approach as
it include way more KDE apps than does Manjaro or possibly even
Kubuntu. Antergos uses an Arch kernel which is also used within
Manjaro, however, Manjaro often tweaks or adds/subtracts from it. The
kernel is a Monolithic kernel much like other Linux distros use,
however, Arch is usually a few steps ahead of everyone else, which
leads into my next point; Arch is ahead of everyone else, this also
means that there may be bugs or issues with running bleeding-edge
software. I recently installed a few days ago and have yet to see any
issues, however, running Arch, it is inevitable that you may need a
backup, especially when it is the only os you have or you are
keeping family photos on your only hard drive. I installed Antergos
on a Crucial MX500 250GB SSD(review will come later.) so I’m not
really using this for mass storage, but I am keeping my eye on some
things. I also noticed that with Arch-based systems, usually the
installer turns TRIM on by default and sets it to run all the time
with the “discard” option. Discard is a mounting parameter which
tells the kernel to force trim to be ran after every erase cycle.
This is nice in that it helps reclaim space for future files,
however, in Linux specifically, this is probably more of a hinder
than anything as it forces the drive to be in use longer, thus taking
a toll on system resources and power consumption. I usually disable
that feature in fstab. Antergos
is a rolling release so it should never need reinstallation, barring
the usual issues with bleeding-edge bugs of course. Antergos has the
ability to use the AUR, however, no Arch-based installations I’ve
used ever seem to come with this enabled by default. One more thing
to mention, the theming and icon themes do seem to be a bit out of
whack in some situations on KDE, never noticed it in XFCE, but gtk
seems to be still on gtk2, which
might not even be that bad as kde native apps seem to theme well.
Icons
seem to not mesh well
with
KDE in this build yet for some reason, however; Papirus, Breeze,
Breath and Obsidian all seem
to work well enough for Icons, with the Breeze-gtk-theme working
pretty well for everything else. All in all, I’d give this
distribution five stars for efficiency and ease of use.
Comments
Post a Comment